Counseling on Processing of Waste into Solid Organic Fertilizer for GAPOKTAN Farmers Rukun Tani Segobang Village, Licin District, Banyuwangi Regency, East Java

Authors

  • Tanti Kustiari Politeknik Negeri Jember, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Ujang Suryadi Politeknik Negeri Jember, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Ikomatun Nadipah Politeknik Negeri Jember, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59247/jppmi.v2i5.95

Keywords:

Group, Waste, organic, Fertilizer, Cattle

Abstract

Cattle and sheep waste contain chemical elements that are beneficial to the environment. Livestock waste which is processed into fertilizer is very useful for the fertility of agricultural land. The processed livestock waste is organic compost or known as manure. Farmers generally use compost to improve soil productivity, so livestock processing businesses have good prospects as an alternative to providing fertilizer other than chemical fertilizers. Farmers in Segobang village have several livestock. The problem is that the waste is not treated and has polluted the environment. Farmers generally have limitations in disposing of livestock waste or manure. In community service activities, trying to introduce ways to use livestock waste to be processed into organic fertilizer. The goal is that it can be used by farmers to fertilize the soil and can reduce input costs for farmers. Community empowerment programs, namely facilitation and counseling for farmers, breeders members of Gapoktan Rukun Tani with animal waste processing materials, the process of making solid organic fertilizers, the urgency of using organic fertilizers, reducing the use of chemical fertilizers. The activity method begins with problem identification, prioritization and problem solving. This activity shows that there is an increase in knowledge, insight, awareness and skills of farmers processing waste into solid organic fertilizer, as well as increasing the use of organic fertilizer for paddy fields and plantations. Involvement requires farmers, Gapoktan officials in collecting waste, fermentation routines every week so they can produce organic fertilizer at 2 tons per 2 weeks. The users of organic fertilizers extend from members of the combined farmer groups to the general public. The success of the Gapoktan farmer institutional unit in organic fertilizer production was able to reduce input costs. This attracted the interest of various other farmer groups to adopt. The program for processing waste into organic fertilizer can provide benefits for increasing the economy, agricultural productivity, the environment and the formation of a new livestock waste processing business unit.

Author Biographies

Tanti Kustiari, Politeknik Negeri Jember, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Agribusiness Postgraduate, Politeknik Negeri Jember, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Ujang Suryadi, Politeknik Negeri Jember, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Agribusiness Postgraduate, Politeknik Negeri Jember, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Ikomatun Nadipah , Politeknik Negeri Jember, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Agribusiness Postgraduate, Politeknik Negeri Jember, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

References

T. Darch et al., “Fertilizer produced from abattoir waste can contribute to phosphorus sustainability, and biofortify crops with minerals,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 9, p. e0221647, Sep. 2019.

S. A. Korolev and D. V. Maykov, “Solution of the problem of optimal control of the process of methanogenesis based on the Pontryagin maximum principle,” Comput. Res. Model., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 357–367, Apr. 2020.

A. Kurniawati, R. D. H. Windriyati, N. K. Wulansari, G. Toth, and Z. Toth, “Alternatives for Circular Bioeconomy in Organic Farming under Excessive Nutrients (Goat manure and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi): A Case Study in Indonesia,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 22, p. 12333, Nov. 2021.

W. Liao et al., “Estimation for ammonia emissions at county level in China from 2013 to 2018,” Sci. China Earth Sci., vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 1116–1127, Jun. 2022.

F. Demichelis, F. Piovano, and S. Fiore, “Biowaste Management in Italy: Challenges and Perspectives,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 15, p. 4213, Aug. 2019.

C. Neubert, “The Anthropocene stinks! Odor, affect, and the entangled politics of livestock waste in a rural Iowa watershed,” Environ. Plan. D Soc. Sp., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 736–752, Aug. 2020.

S. Rozakis et al., “Policy Impact on Regional Biogas Using a Modular Modeling Tool,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 13, p. 3738, Jun. 2021.

M. C. M. Parlato, F. Valenti, G. Midolo, and S. M. C. Porto, “Livestock Wastes Sustainable Use and Management: Assessment of Raw Sheep Wool Reuse and Valorization,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 9, p. 3008, Apr. 2022.

D. Caniani et al., “The Balance Between Capturing Phosphorus from Manure and Wastewater and the Demand for Crop Fertilizer in Italy,” Nat. Resour. Res., vol. 28, no. S1, pp. 77–92, Aug. 2019.

A. Pertiwiningrum, “EVALUATION OF METHANE AND CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM LIVESTOCK WASTE, COMPOST, AND BIOGAS SLUDGE,” Int. J. GEOMATE, vol. 18, no. 68, pp. 35–40, Apr. 2020.

B. Li et al., “Improved gridded ammonia emission inventory in China,” Atmos. Chem. Phys., vol. 21, no. 20, pp. 15883–15900, Oct. 2021.

K.-S. Lee et al., “Monitoring the Dynamics in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Contents during Aerobic Digestion of Swine Slurry,” Agronomy, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 902, Apr. 2022.

D. Wang, Y. Zhang, Q. Chi, X. Hu, S. Li, and S. Li, “Ammonia exposure induced abnormal expression of cytokines and heat shock proteins via glucose metabolism disorders in chicken neutrophils,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 10529–10536, Apr. 2019.

K. Minamikawa, H. C. Khanh, Y. Hosen, T. S. Nam, and N. H. Chiem, “Variable-timing, fixed-rate application of cattle biogas effluent to rice using a leaf color chart: microcosm experiments in Vietnam,” Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 225–234, Jan. 2020.

K. Nakagawa, H. Amano, M. Persson, and R. Berndtsson, “Spatiotemporal variation of nitrate concentrations in soil and groundwater of an intensely polluted agricultural area,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2598, Dec. 2021.

H. Fang and G. Michalski, “Assessing the roles emission sources and atmospheric processes play in simulating <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N of atmospheric NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> a,” Geosci. Model Dev., vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 4239–4258, Jun. 2022.

K. H. P. Madusanka, T. Matsuto, and Y. Tojo, “An on-site survey on household-scale anaerobic digestion in Sri Lanka,” J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 394–405, Mar. 2019.

X. HOU and X. YU, “An ammonia emissions inventory for agricultural sources in Hefei, China,” Atmos. Ocean. Sci. Lett., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 260–267, May 2020.

X. Wang, X. Song, H. Yuan, X. Li, and X. Zuo, “Two-Step Pretreatment of Hydrothermal with Ammonia for Cow Bedding: Pretreatment Characteristics, Anaerobic Digestion Performance and Kinetic Analysis,” Waste and Biomass Valorization, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 5675–5687, Oct. 2021.

A. T. Ngo, G. T. H. Nguyen, D. H. Nong, and L. See, “Simulating the spatial distribution of pollutant loads from pig farming using an agent-based modeling approach,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 29, no. 28, pp. 42037–42054, Jun. 2022.

C. K. Saha, R. Nandi, M. A. Rahman, M. M. Alam, and H. B. Møller, “Biogas technology in commercial poultry and dairy farms of Bangladesh: present scenario and future prospect,” Biomass Convers. Biorefinery, vol. 7, no. 0123456789, Jun. 2022.

C. Tuholske, B. S. Halpern, G. Blasco, J. C. Villasenor, M. Frazier, and K. Caylor, “Mapping global inputs and impacts from of human sewage in coastal ecosystems,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 11, p. e0258898, Nov. 2021.

E. Tamburini, M. Gaglio, G. Castaldelli, and E. A. Fano, “Biogas from Agri-Food and Agricultural Waste Can Appreciate Agro-Ecosystem Services: The Case Study of Emilia Romagna Region,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 20, p. 8392, Oct. 2020.

A. Spada, M. Fiore, U. Monarca, and N. Faccilongo, “R&D Expenditure for New Technology in Livestock Farming: Impact on GHG Reduction in Developing Countries,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 24, p. 7129, Dec. 2019.

C. E. Rodrigues Reis and B. Hu, “Volumetric Scale-Up of a Packed-Bed Ion-Exchange System to Extract Phytate from Thin Stillage,” Membranes (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 2, p. 230, Feb. 2022.

M. O. Doyeni, U. Stulpinaite, A. Baksinskaite, S. Suproniene, and V. Tilvikiene, “Greenhouse gas emissions in agricultural cultivated soils using animal waste-based digestates for crop fertilization,” J. Agric. Sci., vol. 159, no. 1–2, pp. 23–30, Jan. 2021.

D. Díaz-Vázquez, S. C. Alvarado-Cummings, D. Meza-Rodríguez, C. Senés-Guerrero, J. de Anda, and M. S. Gradilla-Hernández, “Evaluation of Biogas Potential from Livestock Manures and Multicriteria Site Selection for Centralized Anaerobic Digester Systems: The Case of Jalisco, México,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 3527, Apr. 2020.

O. B. Akpor, D. E. Odesola, R. E. Thomas, and O. M. Oluba, “Chicken feather hydrolysate as alternative peptone source for microbial cultivation,” F1000Research, vol. 7, p. 1918, Aug. 2019.

A. El Amri, S. M’nassri, N. Nasri, H. Nsir, and R. Majdoub, “Nitrate concentration analysis and prediction in a shallow aquifer in central-eastern Tunisia using artificial neural network and time series modelling,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 29, no. 28, pp. 43300–43318, Jun. 2022.

F. Corona, D. Hidalgo, J. M. Martín-Marroquín, and G. Antolín, “Study of the influence of the reaction parameters on nutrients recovering from digestate by struvite crystallisation,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 28, no. 19, pp. 24362–24374, May 2021.

S. Puri, S. Sharma, A. Kumari, M. Sharma, U. Sharma, and S. Kumar, “Extraction of lignocellulosic constituents from cow dung: preparation and characterisation of nanocellulose,” Biomass Convers. Biorefinery, Nov. 2020.

I. Michalopoulos, D. Mathioudakis, I. Premetis, S. Michalakidi, K. Papadopoulou, and G. Lyberatos, “Anaerobic Co-digestion in a Pilot-Scale Periodic Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (PABR) and Composting of Animal By-Products and Whey,” Waste and Biomass Valorization, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1469–1479, Jun. 2019.

Y. Chang et al., “Resource Utilization of Biogas Waste as Fertilizer in China Needs More Inspections Due to the Risk of Heavy Metals,” Agriculture, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 72, Jan. 2022.

M. Akari and Y. Uchida, “Survival Rates of Microbial Communities from Livestock Waste to Soils: A Comparison between Compost and Digestate,” Appl. Environ. Soil Sci., vol. 2021, no. 3, pp. 1–15, Jan. 2021.

K. W. (Ray) Chan, “Politics of smell: Constructing animal waste governmentality and good farming subjectivities in colonial Hong Kong,” Environ. Plan. C Polit. Sp., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1055–1074, Sep. 2020.

L. J. M. Thuriès et al., “Cash for trash: an agro-economic value assessment of urban organic materials used as fertilizers in Cameroon,” Agron. Sustain. Dev., vol. 39, no. 6, p. 52, Dec. 2019.

H. S. Altan, D. Orhon, and S. Sozen, “Energy Recovery Potential of Livestock Waste with Thermal and Biological Technologies: Analysis on Cattle, Sheep, Goat and Chicken Manure,” Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 39–52, Mar. 2022.

M. Cucina and L. Regni, “New Advances on Nutrients Recovery from Agro-Industrial and Livestock Wastes for Sustainable Farming,” Agronomy, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 2308, Nov. 2021.

G. Rekleitis, K.-J. Haralambous, M. Loizidou, and K. Aravossis, “Utilization of Agricultural and Livestock Waste in Anaerobic Digestion (A.D): Applying the Biorefinery Concept in a Circular Economy,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 17, p. 4428, Aug. 2020.

J. L. Ramos-Suárez, C. L. Vargas-Avendaño, J. Mata-González, and Á. Camacho-Pérez, “Evaluation of poultry manure and goat cheese whey anaerobic co-digestion,” Spanish J. Agric. Res., vol. 17, no. 2, p. e0302, Jul. 2019.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-08

How to Cite

Tanti Kustiari, Ujang Suryadi, & Ikomatun Nadipah. (2022). Counseling on Processing of Waste into Solid Organic Fertilizer for GAPOKTAN Farmers Rukun Tani Segobang Village, Licin District, Banyuwangi Regency, East Java . Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Indonesia, 2(5), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.59247/jppmi.v2i5.95

Issue

Section

Articles